{
  "id": "source:current-problems-the-replication-rate",
  "commit": "8df2d0ddbc6d91b9841c6bbb94dbde1fc7c00137",
  "path": "src/content/problems/the-replication-rate.md",
  "sha256": "e46fec9bd6fff1100c98b794e314750ed30b1d1c1d67de0c5d620b99e754a663",
  "byteLength": 952,
  "text": "---\ntitle: \"The Replication Rate\"\nnumber: 10\nstatement: \"What share of headline charity impact findings replicate when they are tested again?\"\nprogress: \"A systematic replication project covering a defined set of influential findings, publishing the rate with confidence bounds.\"\nconditions: [\"silence-about-failure\", \"measurement-gap\"]\nstatus: open\nbounty: \"Unfunded. The Question Bounties program will attach prizes once it is funded.\"\n---\n\n## Why it matters\n\nThe [Replication Program](/programs/replication-program/) describes published checks in psychology and deworming research. Charitology has not established an equivalent sector-wide rate for charity impact findings. Donors deserve to know how much to trust a headline.\n\n## Where to start\n\nChoose a fixed list of widely cited findings, pre-register the replication plan and publish everything, including findings that replicate. See the [Replication Program](/programs/replication-program/).\n",
  "hash": "da386288a19a5b99058d18849c40da26767f365f0e969a482c78c1a01d8cc1ec"
}