{ "id": "version:problem-measuring-the-source-v1", "recordId": "problem:measuring-the-source", "version": 1, "previousId": null, "adapterVersion": "research-content-v1", "subject": { "type": "entry", "collection": "problems", "frontmatter": { "title": "Measuring the Source", "number": 3, "statement": "How do you measure the impact of source-level work, such as changing a story, a norm or an institution, when the effects are diffuse, shared and delayed?", "progress": "A measurement approach validated on at least one historical source-level change, recovering an effect that independent historians agree took place.", "conditions": [ { "collection": "conditions", "id": "symptom-trap" }, { "collection": "conditions", "id": "measurement-gap" }, { "collection": "conditions", "id": "short-horizon" } ], "bounty": "Unfunded. The Question Bounties program will attach prizes once it is funded.", "sources": [] }, "body": "\n## Why it matters\n\nIf funders require measurements that source work cannot provide, useful work may be missed. That is one possible mechanism behind the [Symptom Trap](/diagnosis/symptom-trap/) hypothesis. Hard-to-measure is not the same as small.\n\n## Where to start\n\nWork backwards from changes everyone agrees happened, such as the spread of oral rehydration therapy or the end of smallpox (see [Historical Case Studies](/record/case-studies/)), and test which measures would have detected them early. Contribution analysis, process tracing and forecasting tournaments are candidate methods.\n" }, "subjectHash": "5998a2220b5dc20e4cab2a388a454b3fa554b674fe09a9affbf6afc495a22951", "authorship": { "state": "unknown", "complete": false, "actorIds": [], "refs": [] }, "sources": [ { "sourceId": "source:current-problems-measuring-the-source", "selector": { "kind": "entry" } } ], "hash": "84de722c6ad0d66750e2e2bae46ab0650e5f4f8da1ef4b55fc8b0221860da058" }