The work of the field

Programs

Research to find out what works, funding to act on it, training to grow the field and outreach to change the habits of giving. Each program names the conditions of the charity system it treats.

26 in all · 3 live · 6 seeded · 8 designed · 9 needs partners

Research

The Open Problems of Charitology

A public list of 23 proposed unanswered questions in doing good, each precise enough to work on, with progress tracked in the open.

Live

Moral Frameworks Program

Compares how eight moral frameworks rank the same causes, so givers can see where values agree, where they part and what each one leaves out.

Seeded

Methods Lab

Compares the ways of giving, from direct cash and policy advocacy to research, mutual aid, volunteering, impact investing and prizes, on the same terms.

Designed

Cause Census

Maps every cause area by how big the problem is, how few resources it gets and how solvable it looks, with the sources and judgments behind each estimate.

Seeded

Evidence Reviews

Systematic reviews of every major intervention, graded the same way and written in plain language, so anyone can see what is known, what is mixed and what nobody has tested.

Seeded

Replication Program

Re-tests the most influential charity impact studies, publishes every result, including the ones that hold up, and reports how often headline findings survive.

Designed

Field Verification

Planned independent, on-the-ground checks that programs do what they report, including asking the people served what changed, with findings published in the open.

Needs partners

Failure Lab

Studies programs and charities that failed or did harm, finds the patterns that connect them and publishes the lessons so the field learns each one once.

Seeded

History of Charity

Studies what worked, what failed and what was mixed across centuries of giving, so today’s choices can draw on long-run evidence that no annual report can provide.

Seeded

Forecasting Tournaments

People predict which interventions and policies will work before the results are in, and every forecast is scored with a Brier score when its question resolves.

Live

Red Team

A standing practice of attacking Charitology’s own claims. Every entry page links to a prefilled GitHub issue for challenging what it says.

Live

Funding

People and education

Reach