Public research ledger

Follow a claim from its source wording through recorded changes and review.

Current published edition

What is recorded, and what remains unreviewed

As recorded by . This is a dated public record of drafts, changes, sources and review declarations. A page, checksum or merged pull request does not establish a scientific result or independent review.

Edition
edition:2026-10-27-initial
Edition checksum
63af9ab52aa86652f81ea1fac0b7c40aaad46cd8623865918d41ec347f9b2cd3
Projection checksum
08a373e3b85d7ed44d36bc472444b5773f7cbd1dde11f60e0053b3ba4884b65c
Period
inclusive to exclusive.
Starting baseline
Unknown before the recorded capture. Present states are not backdated to January.

JSON retains the complete pinned edition. CSV covers every recorded event in this edition; view filters do not change either download.

Recorded activity and qualification

  • 43Stable records
  • 45Subject versions
  • 43Recorded events
  • 0Review declarations
  • 0Subjects with qualifying source review
  • 0Peer-reviewed manuscripts
  • 0Qualifying research results
  • 1Editorial correction artifacts
  • 2Changed claim subjects
  • 23Open problems
  • 0Partially resolved problems
  • 0Solved problems
  • 0Problems under review
  • 0Unresolved challenges

Qualification follows the exact recorded public declarations. The ledger cannot establish identity, independence, source reading or truth by itself. Editorial corrections, proposed methods and software checks are separate from qualifying research results.

Coverage and limits

40 source entries are covered by this edition. Claim-level records cover only their selected wording and context; they do not qualify a whole manuscript. Source-derived case labels describe the published summaries, not Charitology fieldwork or charity ratings.

Entry links open the present site. The separate pinned source text retains this edition’s exact archived bytes.

Records in this edition

Records 1–20 of 43
RecordType and stateReview qualification
PR #3: bounded knowledge claim and founding-poem context

artifact:pr-3-editorial-framing · version 1

Artifact

Editorial correction

Source review: draft
Carnegie’s public libraries

case:carnegie-libraries · version 1

Source-derived case Source review: draft
D.A.R.E.’s original curriculum

case:dare · version 1

Source-derived case Source review: draft
The Green Revolution

case:green-revolution · version 1

Source-derived case Source review: draft
Rebuilding Haiti after the 2010 earthquake

case:haiti-earthquake-reconstruction · version 1

Source-derived case Source review: draft
The hookworm campaign in the American South

case:hookworm-campaign · version 1

Source-derived case Source review: draft
The ALS Ice Bucket Challenge

case:ice-bucket-challenge · version 1

Source-derived case Source review: draft
One Laptop per Child

case:one-laptop-per-child · version 1

Source-derived case Source review: draft
How oral rehydration therapy spread

case:oral-rehydration-therapy-spread · version 1

Source-derived case Source review: draft
PlayPumps

case:playpumps · version 1

Source-derived case Source review: draft
The campaign to eradicate polio

case:polio-eradication · version 1

Source-derived case Source review: draft
The Rosenwald schools

case:rosenwald-schools · version 1

Source-derived case Source review: draft
Scared Straight

case:scared-straight · version 1

Source-derived case Source review: draft
The eradication of smallpox

case:smallpox-eradication · version 1

Source-derived case Source review: draft
Scope of the Depth Census knowledge claim

claim:depth-census-knowledge · version 2

Bounded claim Source review: draft
Framing of the founding poem

claim:ten-dollars-framing · version 2

Bounded claim Source review: draft
Depth without a ladder: a protocol for describing where work acts

manuscript:depth-without-a-ladder · version 1

Manuscript Source review: draft

Peer review: not-peer-reviewed

Ten Dollars

manuscript:ten-dollars · version 1

Manuscript Source review: draft

Peer review: not-peer-reviewed

The feedback contract: designing a giving decision people can correct

manuscript:the-feedback-contract · version 1

Manuscript Source review: draft

Peer review: not-peer-reviewed

Methodology Handbook

method:methodology · version 1

Method Source review: draft
Records 21–40 of 43
RecordType and stateReview qualification
Closing the Feedback Loop

problem:closing-the-feedback-loop · version 1

Research problem

Effective problem state: open

Source review: draft
Discounting the Future

problem:discounting-the-future · version 1

Research problem

Effective problem state: open

Source review: draft
Measuring the Source

problem:measuring-the-source · version 1

Research problem

Effective problem state: open

Source review: draft
Moral Parliament in Practice

problem:moral-parliament-in-practice · version 1

Research problem

Effective problem state: open

Source review: draft
Proximity and Obligation

problem:proximity-and-obligation · version 1

Research problem

Effective problem state: open

Source review: draft
Story Without Bias

problem:story-without-bias · version 1

Research problem

Effective problem state: open

Source review: draft
The Agency Premium

problem:the-agency-premium · version 1

Research problem

Effective problem state: open

Source review: draft
The Counterfactual Problem

problem:the-counterfactual-problem · version 1

Research problem

Effective problem state: open

Source review: draft
The Depth Census

problem:the-depth-census · version 1

Research problem

Effective problem state: open

Source review: draft
The Enough Question

problem:the-enough-question · version 1

Research problem

Effective problem state: open

Source review: draft
The Exchange Rate Problem

problem:the-exchange-rate-problem · version 1

Research problem

Effective problem state: open

Source review: draft
The Failure Commons

problem:the-failure-commons · version 1

Research problem

Effective problem state: open

Source review: draft
The Fragmentation Question

problem:the-fragmentation-question · version 1

Research problem

Effective problem state: open

Source review: draft
The Government Question

problem:the-government-question · version 1

Research problem

Effective problem state: open

Source review: draft
The Money-Time Exchange

problem:the-money-time-exchange · version 1

Research problem

Effective problem state: open

Source review: draft
The Optimal Restriction

problem:the-optimal-restriction · version 1

Research problem

Effective problem state: open

Source review: draft
The Overhead Replacement

problem:the-overhead-replacement · version 1

Research problem

Effective problem state: open

Source review: draft
The Payout Question

problem:the-payout-question · version 1

Research problem

Effective problem state: open

Source review: draft
The Profession Question

problem:the-profession-question · version 1

Research problem

Effective problem state: open

Source review: draft
The Question of Questions

problem:the-question-of-questions · version 1

Research problem

Effective problem state: open

Source review: draft
Records 41–43 of 43
RecordType and stateReview qualification
The Replication Rate

problem:the-replication-rate · version 1

Research problem

Effective problem state: open

Source review: draft
The Status Flip

problem:the-status-flip · version 1

Research problem

Effective problem state: open

Source review: draft
When Charity Harms

problem:when-charity-harms · version 1

Research problem

Effective problem state: open

Source review: draft

Dated public metadata observations

These observations record only the displayed metadata at inspection. A merge, closed issue or empty review list does not establish research or independent review.

github-pull-request · 2026-10-27T08:20:16.587Z

Observed public object

{
  "base": "975bbbbbd198d4b3c4e1777013d0410588a838b3",
  "draft": false,
  "head": "3653d41717a86db2933b02664d7026a329350a66",
  "mergeCommit": "8df2d0ddbc6d91b9841c6bbb94dbde1fc7c00137",
  "mergedAt": "2026-10-27T08:10:57.000Z",
  "number": 15,
  "state": "closed"
}

be39e645f9291ea3931584665b011df77bfa8340e4d32f36562eb526f8e62396

github-pull-request · 2026-10-27T08:20:16.587Z

Observed public object

{
  "base": "905bdd27bb5f16027c3b3ad3c0f5ee3fc18e3e45",
  "draft": false,
  "head": "510320528e89f45caa9c42eb5a6eda3d6ad1bede",
  "mergeCommit": "3a57d24acc6efd4eb3ae60c59da36ea17c023fb9",
  "mergedAt": "2026-10-26T05:24:43.000Z",
  "number": 3,
  "state": "closed"
}

1ec26b57bd6ef466311b11958d47e9d144ec150ea5689838ae8036eb363aacbf

github-review-list · 2026-10-27T08:20:16.587Z

Observed public object

{
  "prNumber": 3,
  "reviewIds": []
}

3b7b719dbdd25b9937ba6c640f7234921611db30818b5675db41b9fa3534d926

github-issue · 2026-10-27T08:20:16.587Z

Observed public object

{
  "commentCount": 0,
  "number": 1,
  "state": "open"
}

b411d756f95b7434bc8a2a73dd5599f751afe621b2ab673c0e2e7b056d37bb14

Corrections stay public

This ledger reads checked-in public evidence. It does not read private browser registers, publish a local result, assign reviewers or rate charities. New evidence and corrections enter through the repository’s public contribution process.

How to contribute or challenge a claim