Version 1: Proximity and Obligation
- Subject checksum
9cc43abf5a4e1b3eb75d6661951b1e87c24c8add90b1a5267538b10b7d7b1e86- Version checksum
9a108ac483faf3420bae567175b03e5acbb12983658e119dfe8b227ad07713f3- Authorship declaration
- unknown; completeness unknown.
- bounty
- Unfunded. The Question Bounties program will attach prizes once it is funded.
- conditions
[ { "collection": "conditions", "id": "proximity-pull" } ]- number
- 18
- progress
- Experimental evidence on how givers allocate with and without comparisons, alongside a clear account of the moral positions.
- statement
- How should distance weigh in giving, and what do givers choose when they see honest comparisons?
Exact archived Markdown body
Inert source text, including its original formatting. It is not executed as page markup.
## Why it matters The [Proximity Pull](/diagnosis/proximity-pull/) is partly a moral question and partly an information gap. The information gap can be closed, and then we can see what people choose. ## Where to start A scoped survey experiment could test how comparisons across distance affect choices, with its cost and limits stated. The moral side is mapped in the [Disagreement Register](/record/disagreements/).
Pinned source capture
- src/content/problems/proximity-and-obligation.md · whole entry
9de684744bef07921258225750feab5695f0122451e71fb09d01e9b43de936fa· 854 UTF-8 bytes · commit8df2d0ddbc6d91b9841c6bbb94dbde1fc7c00137
Exact version fields and declaration references
{
"adapterVersion": "research-content-v1",
"authorship": {
"actorIds": [],
"complete": false,
"refs": [],
"state": "unknown"
},
"hash": "9a108ac483faf3420bae567175b03e5acbb12983658e119dfe8b227ad07713f3",
"id": "version:problem-proximity-and-obligation-v1",
"previousId": null,
"recordId": "problem:proximity-and-obligation",
"sources": [
{
"selector": {
"kind": "entry"
},
"sourceId": "source:current-problems-proximity-and-obligation"
}
],
"subject": {
"body": "\n## Why it matters\n\nThe [Proximity Pull](/diagnosis/proximity-pull/) is partly a moral question and partly an information gap. The information gap can be closed, and then we can see what people choose.\n\n## Where to start\n\nA scoped survey experiment could test how comparisons across distance affect choices, with its cost and limits stated. The moral side is mapped in the [Disagreement Register](/record/disagreements/).\n",
"collection": "problems",
"frontmatter": {
"bounty": "Unfunded. The Question Bounties program will attach prizes once it is funded.",
"conditions": [
{
"collection": "conditions",
"id": "proximity-pull"
}
],
"number": 18,
"progress": "Experimental evidence on how givers allocate with and without comparisons, alongside a clear account of the moral positions.",
"sources": [],
"statement": "How should distance weigh in giving, and what do givers choose when they see honest comparisons?",
"title": "Proximity and Obligation"
},
"type": "entry"
},
"subjectHash": "9cc43abf5a4e1b3eb75d6661951b1e87c24c8add90b1a5267538b10b7d7b1e86",
"version": 1
}