Version 1: Closing the Feedback Loop
- Subject checksum
f9865c4a1ff827fc65bc2bc14226d063c41d5529fac674c14941e334aec8ecaa- Version checksum
828a83f2edc3417a37d779e4d67464e519775ff845780d733a54199c55ac92d1- Authorship declaration
- unknown; completeness unknown.
- bounty
- Unfunded. The Question Bounties program will attach prizes once it is funded.
- conditions
[ { "collection": "conditions", "id": "missing-feedback-loop" }, { "collection": "conditions", "id": "missing-voice" } ]- number
- 5
- progress
- A working mechanism in which feedback from the people served measurably changes funding, tested against a comparison group.
- statement
- What mechanism lets the people a charity serves send a signal that moves money, the way prices do in markets?
Exact archived Markdown body
Inert source text, including its original formatting. It is not executed as page markup.
## Why it matters This is the root condition of the [Diagnosis](/diagnosis/). Charitology hypothesizes that improving this loop could also change other conditions. ## Where to start Beneficiary feedback surveys, participatory grantmaking and cash transfers (where recipients choose what to buy) are three existing mechanisms that give the people served some say. The open question is which of them, if any, can be scaled into a signal donors actually follow.
Pinned source capture
- src/content/problems/closing-the-feedback-loop.md · whole entry
1182bbbf5061f57cc331c7ff4935f2068f7f4e6db8cca434a2ba066717a198c1· 931 UTF-8 bytes · commit8df2d0ddbc6d91b9841c6bbb94dbde1fc7c00137
Exact version fields and declaration references
{
"adapterVersion": "research-content-v1",
"authorship": {
"actorIds": [],
"complete": false,
"refs": [],
"state": "unknown"
},
"hash": "828a83f2edc3417a37d779e4d67464e519775ff845780d733a54199c55ac92d1",
"id": "version:problem-closing-the-feedback-loop-v1",
"previousId": null,
"recordId": "problem:closing-the-feedback-loop",
"sources": [
{
"selector": {
"kind": "entry"
},
"sourceId": "source:current-problems-closing-the-feedback-loop"
}
],
"subject": {
"body": "\n## Why it matters\n\nThis is the root condition of the [Diagnosis](/diagnosis/). Charitology hypothesizes that improving this loop could also change other conditions.\n\n## Where to start\n\nBeneficiary feedback surveys, participatory grantmaking and cash transfers (where recipients choose what to buy) are three existing mechanisms that give the people served some say. The open question is which of them, if any, can be scaled into a signal donors actually follow.\n",
"collection": "problems",
"frontmatter": {
"bounty": "Unfunded. The Question Bounties program will attach prizes once it is funded.",
"conditions": [
{
"collection": "conditions",
"id": "missing-feedback-loop"
},
{
"collection": "conditions",
"id": "missing-voice"
}
],
"number": 5,
"progress": "A working mechanism in which feedback from the people served measurably changes funding, tested against a comparison group.",
"sources": [],
"statement": "What mechanism lets the people a charity serves send a signal that moves money, the way prices do in markets?",
"title": "Closing the Feedback Loop"
},
"type": "entry"
},
"subjectHash": "f9865c4a1ff827fc65bc2bc14226d063c41d5529fac674c14941e334aec8ecaa",
"version": 1
}