Research history

Current published edition

Scope of the Depth Census knowledge claim

As recorded by . This is a dated public record of drafts, changes, sources and review declarations. A page, checksum or merged pull request does not establish a scientific result or independent review.

Edition
edition:2026-10-27-initial
Edition checksum
63af9ab52aa86652f81ea1fac0b7c40aaad46cd8623865918d41ec347f9b2cd3
Projection checksum
08a373e3b85d7ed44d36bc472444b5773f7cbd1dde11f60e0053b3ba4884b65c
Period
inclusive to exclusive.
Starting baseline
Unknown before the recorded capture. Present states are not backdated to January.

JSON retains the complete pinned edition. CSV covers every recorded event in this edition; view filters do not change either download.

Recorded activity and qualification

  • 43Stable records
  • 45Subject versions
  • 43Recorded events
  • 0Review declarations
  • 0Subjects with qualifying source review
  • 0Peer-reviewed manuscripts
  • 0Qualifying research results
  • 1Editorial correction artifacts
  • 2Changed claim subjects
  • 23Open problems
  • 0Partially resolved problems
  • 0Solved problems
  • 0Problems under review
  • 0Unresolved challenges

Qualification follows the exact recorded public declarations. The ledger cannot establish identity, independence, source reading or truth by itself. Editorial corrections, proposed methods and software checks are separate from qualifying research results.

Coverage and limits

40 source entries are covered by this edition. Claim-level records cover only their selected wording and context; they do not qualify a whole manuscript. Source-derived case labels describe the published summaries, not Charitology fieldwork or charity ratings.

Entry links open the present site. The separate pinned source text retains this edition’s exact archived bytes.

Scope of the Depth Census knowledge claim · Bounded claim · version 2
Source review: draft

claim:depth-census-knowledge

Qualification follows the exact recorded public declarations. The ledger cannot establish identity, independence, source reading or truth by itself.

Versions and exact subjects

Version entries 1–2

Version 2: Scope of the Depth Census knowledge claim

Current subject in this edition

Subject checksum
6f3b6d06a2d61893e35d33ae513a3959f44f1321c2bd43d30ff95c54b25fe9a3
Version checksum
41cecbcc688f19234fe1b5ee880b1465722a4e9c5cbd1fc7e7b3d64fedfe12e2
Authorship declaration
unknown; completeness unknown.

Bounded claim · not-applicable · parent problem:the-depth-census

Charitology’s founding hypothesis, [the Symptom Trap](/diagnosis/symptom-trap/), says the charity system is weighted toward symptoms. Charitology has not established the current mix. If the hypothesis is wrong, the field should be the first to say so. The census would supply a descriptive baseline. Deciding whether a mix is appropriate also requires an explicit standard tied to the goals being considered.
Exact selected context
Why it matters
Pinned source capture
Exact version fields and declaration references
{
  "adapterVersion": "research-content-v1",
  "authorship": {
    "actorIds": [],
    "complete": false,
    "refs": [],
    "state": "unknown"
  },
  "hash": "41cecbcc688f19234fe1b5ee880b1465722a4e9c5cbd1fc7e7b3d64fedfe12e2",
  "id": "version:claim-depth-census-knowledge-v2",
  "previousId": "version:claim-depth-census-knowledge-v1",
  "recordId": "claim:depth-census-knowledge",
  "sources": [
    {
      "selector": {
        "adapter": "depth-census-knowledge-v1",
        "bodyExcerpt": "Charitology’s founding hypothesis, [the Symptom Trap](/diagnosis/symptom-trap/), says the charity system is weighted toward symptoms. Charitology has not established the current mix. If the hypothesis is wrong, the field should be the first to say so. The census would supply a descriptive baseline. Deciding whether a mix is appropriate also requires an explicit standard tied to the goals being considered.",
        "frontmatterKeys": [],
        "kind": "claim"
      },
      "sourceId": "source:pr-3-after-depth-census"
    }
  ],
  "subject": {
    "context": "Why it matters",
    "evidence": "not-applicable",
    "parentId": "problem:the-depth-census",
    "sources": [],
    "statement": "Charitology’s founding hypothesis, [the Symptom Trap](/diagnosis/symptom-trap/), says the charity system is weighted toward symptoms. Charitology has not established the current mix. If the hypothesis is wrong, the field should be the first to say so. The census would supply a descriptive baseline. Deciding whether a mix is appropriate also requires an explicit standard tied to the goals being considered.",
    "title": "Scope of the Depth Census knowledge claim",
    "type": "claim"
  },
  "subjectHash": "6f3b6d06a2d61893e35d33ae513a3959f44f1321c2bd43d30ff95c54b25fe9a3",
  "version": 2
}

Version 1: Scope of the Depth Census knowledge claim

Historical subject; retained for the record

Subject checksum
9792de6050cabd1ef2715b6145183702a6a1e5f448563b7474d82c066fd64b4e
Version checksum
78292a918c91a6f6b80b3148da6531f9fab51aedcc3d1206fe833de7fd92843e
Authorship declaration
unknown; completeness unknown.

Bounded claim · not-applicable · parent problem:the-depth-census

Charitology’s founding hypothesis, [the Symptom Trap](/diagnosis/symptom-trap/), says the charity system is weighted toward symptoms. Nobody has checked. If the hypothesis is wrong, the field should be the first to say so. If it’s right, the census gives every later effort a baseline to move.
Exact selected context
Why it matters
Pinned source capture
Exact version fields and declaration references
{
  "adapterVersion": "research-content-v1",
  "authorship": {
    "actorIds": [],
    "complete": false,
    "refs": [],
    "state": "unknown"
  },
  "hash": "78292a918c91a6f6b80b3148da6531f9fab51aedcc3d1206fe833de7fd92843e",
  "id": "version:claim-depth-census-knowledge-v1",
  "previousId": null,
  "recordId": "claim:depth-census-knowledge",
  "sources": [
    {
      "selector": {
        "adapter": "depth-census-knowledge-v1",
        "bodyExcerpt": "Charitology’s founding hypothesis, [the Symptom Trap](/diagnosis/symptom-trap/), says the charity system is weighted toward symptoms. Nobody has checked. If the hypothesis is wrong, the field should be the first to say so. If it’s right, the census gives every later effort a baseline to move.",
        "frontmatterKeys": [],
        "kind": "claim"
      },
      "sourceId": "source:pr-3-before-depth-census"
    }
  ],
  "subject": {
    "context": "Why it matters",
    "evidence": "not-applicable",
    "parentId": "problem:the-depth-census",
    "sources": [],
    "statement": "Charitology’s founding hypothesis, [the Symptom Trap](/diagnosis/symptom-trap/), says the charity system is weighted toward symptoms. Nobody has checked. If the hypothesis is wrong, the field should be the first to say so. If it’s right, the census gives every later effort a baseline to move.",
    "title": "Scope of the Depth Census knowledge claim",
    "type": "claim"
  },
  "subjectHash": "9792de6050cabd1ef2715b6145183702a6a1e5f448563b7474d82c066fd64b4e",
  "version": 1
}

Timeline in recorded order

Public occurrence time and ledger recording time are different. A coverage baseline records what was present at capture; it does not invent an earlier history.

Events 1–1

Coverage baseline

Recorded order
41; sequence 1 for this record.
Public occurrence
Undated / no earlier occurrence asserted · undated
Recorded in ledger

Capture the corrected claim as the current baseline while retaining its archived predecessor. The later-listed editorial artifact records the actual PR merge; this baseline does not invent an earlier ledger receipt.

Observed baseline: version 2.

Exact event fields
{
  "actorIds": [],
  "hash": "3f522ae1d8122f6a9996300705a0b6a34c1a06a4e684edf1d2bba80d73cc57b7",
  "id": "event:claim-depth-census-knowledge-1",
  "initialProblemState": null,
  "observationIds": [],
  "occurredAt": null,
  "ordinal": 41,
  "previousHash": null,
  "previousId": null,
  "reason": "Capture the corrected claim as the current baseline while retaining its archived predecessor. The later-listed editorial artifact records the actual PR merge; this baseline does not invent an earlier ledger receipt.",
  "recordId": "claim:depth-census-knowledge",
  "recordedAt": "2026-10-27T08:31:31.000Z",
  "refs": [],
  "sequence": 1,
  "timeBasis": "undated",
  "type": "baseline",
  "version": {
    "recordId": "claim:depth-census-knowledge",
    "subjectHash": "6f3b6d06a2d61893e35d33ae513a3959f44f1321c2bd43d30ff95c54b25fe9a3",
    "version": 2
  }
}

Review declarations

No public review declaration is recorded for this subject in this edition.

Dated public metadata observations

These observations record only the displayed metadata at inspection. A merge, closed issue or empty review list does not establish research or independent review.

github-pull-request · 2026-10-27T08:20:16.587Z

Observed public object

{
  "base": "975bbbbbd198d4b3c4e1777013d0410588a838b3",
  "draft": false,
  "head": "3653d41717a86db2933b02664d7026a329350a66",
  "mergeCommit": "8df2d0ddbc6d91b9841c6bbb94dbde1fc7c00137",
  "mergedAt": "2026-10-27T08:10:57.000Z",
  "number": 15,
  "state": "closed"
}

be39e645f9291ea3931584665b011df77bfa8340e4d32f36562eb526f8e62396

github-pull-request · 2026-10-27T08:20:16.587Z

Observed public object

{
  "base": "905bdd27bb5f16027c3b3ad3c0f5ee3fc18e3e45",
  "draft": false,
  "head": "510320528e89f45caa9c42eb5a6eda3d6ad1bede",
  "mergeCommit": "3a57d24acc6efd4eb3ae60c59da36ea17c023fb9",
  "mergedAt": "2026-10-26T05:24:43.000Z",
  "number": 3,
  "state": "closed"
}

1ec26b57bd6ef466311b11958d47e9d144ec150ea5689838ae8036eb363aacbf

github-review-list · 2026-10-27T08:20:16.587Z

Observed public object

{
  "prNumber": 3,
  "reviewIds": []
}

3b7b719dbdd25b9937ba6c640f7234921611db30818b5675db41b9fa3534d926

github-issue · 2026-10-27T08:20:16.587Z

Observed public object

{
  "commentCount": 0,
  "number": 1,
  "state": "open"
}

b411d756f95b7434bc8a2a73dd5599f751afe621b2ab673c0e2e7b056d37bb14

Corrections stay public

This ledger reads checked-in public evidence. It does not read private browser registers, publish a local result, assign reviewers or rate charities. New evidence and corrections enter through the repository’s public contribution process.

How to contribute or challenge a claim