Research history

Current published edition

The Depth Census

As recorded by . This is a dated public record of drafts, changes, sources and review declarations. A page, checksum or merged pull request does not establish a scientific result or independent review.

Edition
edition:2026-10-27-initial
Edition checksum
63af9ab52aa86652f81ea1fac0b7c40aaad46cd8623865918d41ec347f9b2cd3
Projection checksum
08a373e3b85d7ed44d36bc472444b5773f7cbd1dde11f60e0053b3ba4884b65c
Period
inclusive to exclusive.
Starting baseline
Unknown before the recorded capture. Present states are not backdated to January.

JSON retains the complete pinned edition. CSV covers every recorded event in this edition; view filters do not change either download.

Recorded activity and qualification

  • 43Stable records
  • 45Subject versions
  • 43Recorded events
  • 0Review declarations
  • 0Subjects with qualifying source review
  • 0Peer-reviewed manuscripts
  • 0Qualifying research results
  • 1Editorial correction artifacts
  • 2Changed claim subjects
  • 23Open problems
  • 0Partially resolved problems
  • 0Solved problems
  • 0Problems under review
  • 0Unresolved challenges

Qualification follows the exact recorded public declarations. The ledger cannot establish identity, independence, source reading or truth by itself. Editorial corrections, proposed methods and software checks are separate from qualifying research results.

Coverage and limits

40 source entries are covered by this edition. Claim-level records cover only their selected wording and context; they do not qualify a whole manuscript. Source-derived case labels describe the published summaries, not Charitology fieldwork or charity ratings.

Entry links open the present site. The separate pinned source text retains this edition’s exact archived bytes.

The Depth Census · Research problem · version 1
Source review: draftProblem: open

problem:the-depth-census

Effective problem state
open
Last recorded state
open
Current support
baseline
Last recorded disposition
No scientific disposition is recorded.

Qualification follows the exact recorded public declarations. The ledger cannot establish identity, independence, source reading or truth by itself.

Versions and exact subjects

Version entries 1–1

Version 1: The Depth Census

Current subject in this edition

Subject checksum
7b530c516e616ae16488901f3ead08f98fdee50a723e15796b0d4c7b2e22949a
Version checksum
8bcaf70dfa2fd3a04e82f965317308a64b1c36c9de29d19fbc2daea2432457f5
Authorship declaration
unknown; completeness unknown.
bounty
Unfunded. The Question Bounties program will attach prizes once it is funded.
conditions
[
  {
    "collection": "conditions",
    "id": "symptom-trap"
  },
  {
    "collection": "conditions",
    "id": "measurement-gap"
  }
]
number
1
progress
A public, reproducible estimate of the depth mix for at least one country’s giving, with a method others can rerun and a stated error range.
statement
What share of the world’s charitable money goes to relief, repair, prevention, structure and source work?
Exact archived Markdown body

Inert source text, including its original formatting. It is not executed as page markup.

## Why it matters

Charitology’s founding hypothesis, [the Symptom Trap](/diagnosis/symptom-trap/), says the charity system is weighted toward symptoms. Charitology has not established the current mix. If the hypothesis is wrong, the field should be the first to say so. The census would supply a descriptive baseline. Deciding whether a mix is appropriate also requires an explicit standard tied to the goals being considered.

## Where to start

Draw a random sample of organizations from a public registry and code each one on the [depth scale](/method/#depth), weighting by spending. Program descriptions from Form 990 filings, published openly by [Charity Impact Media](https://theguysaccount.github.io/charity-impact-media/), and the foundation grants in [WHOFUNDS](https://theguysaccount.github.io/whofunds-open-grant-graph/) are open starting points. How often two independent coders agree is itself a finding: if people can’t agree on depth, the scale needs work first.
Pinned source capture
Exact version fields and declaration references
{
  "adapterVersion": "research-content-v1",
  "authorship": {
    "actorIds": [],
    "complete": false,
    "refs": [],
    "state": "unknown"
  },
  "hash": "8bcaf70dfa2fd3a04e82f965317308a64b1c36c9de29d19fbc2daea2432457f5",
  "id": "version:problem-the-depth-census-v1",
  "previousId": null,
  "recordId": "problem:the-depth-census",
  "sources": [
    {
      "selector": {
        "kind": "entry"
      },
      "sourceId": "source:current-problems-the-depth-census"
    }
  ],
  "subject": {
    "body": "\n## Why it matters\n\nCharitology’s founding hypothesis, [the Symptom Trap](/diagnosis/symptom-trap/), says the charity system is weighted toward symptoms. Charitology has not established the current mix. If the hypothesis is wrong, the field should be the first to say so. The census would supply a descriptive baseline. Deciding whether a mix is appropriate also requires an explicit standard tied to the goals being considered.\n\n## Where to start\n\nDraw a random sample of organizations from a public registry and code each one on the [depth scale](/method/#depth), weighting by spending. Program descriptions from Form 990 filings, published openly by [Charity Impact Media](https://theguysaccount.github.io/charity-impact-media/), and the foundation grants in [WHOFUNDS](https://theguysaccount.github.io/whofunds-open-grant-graph/) are open starting points. How often two independent coders agree is itself a finding: if people can’t agree on depth, the scale needs work first.\n",
    "collection": "problems",
    "frontmatter": {
      "bounty": "Unfunded. The Question Bounties program will attach prizes once it is funded.",
      "conditions": [
        {
          "collection": "conditions",
          "id": "symptom-trap"
        },
        {
          "collection": "conditions",
          "id": "measurement-gap"
        }
      ],
      "number": 1,
      "progress": "A public, reproducible estimate of the depth mix for at least one country’s giving, with a method others can rerun and a stated error range.",
      "sources": [],
      "statement": "What share of the world’s charitable money goes to relief, repair, prevention, structure and source work?",
      "title": "The Depth Census"
    },
    "type": "entry"
  },
  "subjectHash": "7b530c516e616ae16488901f3ead08f98fdee50a723e15796b0d4c7b2e22949a",
  "version": 1
}

Timeline in recorded order

Public occurrence time and ledger recording time are different. A coverage baseline records what was present at capture; it does not invent an earlier history.

Events 1–1

Coverage baseline

Recorded order
25; sequence 1 for this record.
Public occurrence
Undated / no earlier occurrence asserted · undated
Recorded in ledger

Initial capture of current source wording; no earlier independent review or historical event time is asserted.

Observed baseline: version 1; problem open.

Exact event fields
{
  "actorIds": [],
  "hash": "1996fc1174e2c659f9916bdd3a64e8082dcf96565e3086215a1609c185394677",
  "id": "event:problem-the-depth-census-1",
  "initialProblemState": "open",
  "observationIds": [],
  "occurredAt": null,
  "ordinal": 25,
  "previousHash": null,
  "previousId": null,
  "reason": "Initial capture of current source wording; no earlier independent review or historical event time is asserted.",
  "recordId": "problem:the-depth-census",
  "recordedAt": "2026-10-27T08:31:31.000Z",
  "refs": [],
  "sequence": 1,
  "timeBasis": "undated",
  "type": "baseline",
  "version": {
    "recordId": "problem:the-depth-census",
    "subjectHash": "7b530c516e616ae16488901f3ead08f98fdee50a723e15796b0d4c7b2e22949a",
    "version": 1
  }
}

Review declarations

No public review declaration is recorded for this subject in this edition.

Dated public metadata observations

These observations record only the displayed metadata at inspection. A merge, closed issue or empty review list does not establish research or independent review.

github-pull-request · 2026-10-27T08:20:16.587Z

Observed public object

{
  "base": "975bbbbbd198d4b3c4e1777013d0410588a838b3",
  "draft": false,
  "head": "3653d41717a86db2933b02664d7026a329350a66",
  "mergeCommit": "8df2d0ddbc6d91b9841c6bbb94dbde1fc7c00137",
  "mergedAt": "2026-10-27T08:10:57.000Z",
  "number": 15,
  "state": "closed"
}

be39e645f9291ea3931584665b011df77bfa8340e4d32f36562eb526f8e62396

github-pull-request · 2026-10-27T08:20:16.587Z

Observed public object

{
  "base": "905bdd27bb5f16027c3b3ad3c0f5ee3fc18e3e45",
  "draft": false,
  "head": "510320528e89f45caa9c42eb5a6eda3d6ad1bede",
  "mergeCommit": "3a57d24acc6efd4eb3ae60c59da36ea17c023fb9",
  "mergedAt": "2026-10-26T05:24:43.000Z",
  "number": 3,
  "state": "closed"
}

1ec26b57bd6ef466311b11958d47e9d144ec150ea5689838ae8036eb363aacbf

github-review-list · 2026-10-27T08:20:16.587Z

Observed public object

{
  "prNumber": 3,
  "reviewIds": []
}

3b7b719dbdd25b9937ba6c640f7234921611db30818b5675db41b9fa3534d926

github-issue · 2026-10-27T08:20:16.587Z

Observed public object

{
  "commentCount": 0,
  "number": 1,
  "state": "open"
}

b411d756f95b7434bc8a2a73dd5599f751afe621b2ab673c0e2e7b056d37bb14

Corrections stay public

This ledger reads checked-in public evidence. It does not read private browser registers, publish a local result, assign reviewers or rate charities. New evidence and corrections enter through the repository’s public contribution process.

How to contribute or challenge a claim