Version 1: The Green Revolution
- Subject checksum
1404e48632c4609f31213b0a4a6e41434b2c1960341512c42d50ffeb984b8a3b- Version checksum
fe6be194a55f60c8f4789bd923e05c2688de02772dca164f5d88e7fe753b1ed8- Authorship declaration
- unknown; completeness unknown.
- conditions
[ { "collection": "conditions", "id": "single-lens" }, { "collection": "conditions", "id": "short-horizon" } ]- depth
- 3
- era
- 1943–2000
- kind
- mixed
- lessons
[ "Research that every farmer can use is a public good. Funding the institutions that keep producing it can change a whole food system, not one farm at a time.", "Measuring success in one unit, tons of grain, hid costs that were counted in other units, such as water, soil, diets and who was left out.", "Many of the harms grew from the rules around the technology, such as subsidies that encouraged overuse of inputs. The same tool does more or less damage depending on the policies it arrives with.", "Costs that arrive decades later are easy to leave out of a success story. Long-horizon work needs long-horizon accounting." ]
- place
- Mexico, South and Southeast Asia, and other developing regions
- summary
- Foundation-funded crop research gave farmers high-yield wheat and rice, and cereal harvests in the developing world roughly tripled. The gains were uneven, and some of the costs, from falling water tables to narrower diets, showed up decades later.
Exact archived Markdown body
Inert source text, including its original formatting. It is not executed as page markup.
## What happened In 1943 the Rockefeller Foundation began a farm research program with Mexico’s government. Mexico supplied the research station, and the foundation paid the scientists. One of them, the plant pathologist Norman Borlaug, bred dwarf wheat suited to Mexican conditions, and by 1956 Mexico was self-sufficient in wheat. In the mid-1960s he brought dwarf wheat to India and Pakistan, where production rose sharply. The Rockefeller and Ford foundations also built the International Rice Research Institute in the Philippines, which opened in 1960 and bred the high-yield rice IR-8. A 1968 speech called the movement a “Green Revolution,” and in 1970 Borlaug received the Nobel Peace Prize. The scale of the result is hard to overstate. In a 2012 review, Prabhu Pingali of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation reports that cereal production in the developing world tripled over about 50 years, while the population more than doubled and farmland grew by only about 30 percent. The review cites estimates that without the new crop varieties, food production in developing countries would have been almost 20 percent lower and world food and feed prices 35 to 65 percent higher. In Asia, each 1 percent rise in crop productivity has been estimated to cut the number of poor people by 0.48 percent. ## Where it sits in the system On the [depth scale](/method/#depth) this is **structure** (level 3). The work changed the institutions that produce food. The early research centers in Mexico and the Philippines grew into a permanent international network for crop research. It is mixed because the ledger has more than one column, and Pingali’s own review documents the other columns. The gains were concentrated in irrigated, high-rainfall areas. Poorer rain-fed regions and women farmers gained less. By 1998 modern varieties covered 82 percent of the planted area in Asia but only 27 percent in Africa. Diets gained calories but often lost variety. Overuse of fertilizer, pesticides and water degraded soils and polluted water, harms Pingali attributes mostly to subsidies and price policies rather than to the seeds themselves. In northern India, a satellite study found groundwater falling fast between 2002 and 2008, mainly because of pumping for irrigation. Seen through one lens, yield, this is among the great successes in history. Seen through others, such as the environment, future generations or fairness, the picture is more complicated. That gap is the [Single Lens](/diagnosis/single-lens/). The costs that came due decades later are the [Short Horizon](/diagnosis/short-horizon/). ## What carries over Paying for public research, and for the institutions that keep it going, can change a whole system. The same reach means the side effects are system-sized too. Count every column of the ledger before calling the result, and keep counting after the headlines move on. How much harms to future people should weigh against gains today is [Open Problem 13, Discounting the Future](/open-problems/discounting-the-future/).
Cited evidence
- Green Revolution: Impacts, limits, and the path ahead · Prabhu L. Pingali, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109(31) · 2012
- Photo Essay: Mexico and the Launch of the Green Revolution · Liesel Vink, Rockefeller Archive Center · 2019
- Norman Borlaug, Facts · NobelPrize.org
- India groundwater · Reports a satellite study finding that northern India lost more than 109 cubic kilometers of groundwater between 2002 and 2008, mainly to irrigation pumping. · University of California, Irvine, on Rodell, Velicogna and Famiglietti in Nature 460 · 2009
Pinned source capture
- src/content/cases/green-revolution.md · whole entry
435108f0b5bf0b1da4bd4cd08f7430dba2841714295489d6773c31f14913d8d5· 5145 UTF-8 bytes · commit8df2d0ddbc6d91b9841c6bbb94dbde1fc7c00137
Exact version fields and declaration references
{
"adapterVersion": "research-content-v1",
"authorship": {
"actorIds": [],
"complete": false,
"refs": [],
"state": "unknown"
},
"hash": "fe6be194a55f60c8f4789bd923e05c2688de02772dca164f5d88e7fe753b1ed8",
"id": "version:case-green-revolution-v1",
"previousId": null,
"recordId": "case:green-revolution",
"sources": [
{
"selector": {
"kind": "entry"
},
"sourceId": "source:current-cases-green-revolution"
}
],
"subject": {
"body": "\n## What happened\n\nIn 1943 the Rockefeller Foundation began a farm research program with Mexico’s government. Mexico supplied the research station, and the foundation paid the scientists. One of them, the plant pathologist Norman Borlaug, bred dwarf wheat suited to Mexican conditions, and by 1956 Mexico was self-sufficient in wheat. In the mid-1960s he brought dwarf wheat to India and Pakistan, where production rose sharply. The Rockefeller and Ford foundations also built the International Rice Research Institute in the Philippines, which opened in 1960 and bred the high-yield rice IR-8. A 1968 speech called the movement a “Green Revolution,” and in 1970 Borlaug received the Nobel Peace Prize.\n\nThe scale of the result is hard to overstate. In a 2012 review, Prabhu Pingali of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation reports that cereal production in the developing world tripled over about 50 years, while the population more than doubled and farmland grew by only about 30 percent. The review cites estimates that without the new crop varieties, food production in developing countries would have been almost 20 percent lower and world food and feed prices 35 to 65 percent higher. In Asia, each 1 percent rise in crop productivity has been estimated to cut the number of poor people by 0.48 percent.\n\n## Where it sits in the system\n\nOn the [depth scale](/method/#depth) this is **structure** (level 3). The work changed the institutions that produce food. The early research centers in Mexico and the Philippines grew into a permanent international network for crop research.\n\nIt is mixed because the ledger has more than one column, and Pingali’s own review documents the other columns. The gains were concentrated in irrigated, high-rainfall areas. Poorer rain-fed regions and women farmers gained less. By 1998 modern varieties covered 82 percent of the planted area in Asia but only 27 percent in Africa. Diets gained calories but often lost variety. Overuse of fertilizer, pesticides and water degraded soils and polluted water, harms Pingali attributes mostly to subsidies and price policies rather than to the seeds themselves. In northern India, a satellite study found groundwater falling fast between 2002 and 2008, mainly because of pumping for irrigation.\n\nSeen through one lens, yield, this is among the great successes in history. Seen through others, such as the environment, future generations or fairness, the picture is more complicated. That gap is the [Single Lens](/diagnosis/single-lens/). The costs that came due decades later are the [Short Horizon](/diagnosis/short-horizon/).\n\n## What carries over\n\nPaying for public research, and for the institutions that keep it going, can change a whole system. The same reach means the side effects are system-sized too. Count every column of the ledger before calling the result, and keep counting after the headlines move on. How much harms to future people should weigh against gains today is [Open Problem 13, Discounting the Future](/open-problems/discounting-the-future/).\n",
"collection": "cases",
"frontmatter": {
"conditions": [
{
"collection": "conditions",
"id": "single-lens"
},
{
"collection": "conditions",
"id": "short-horizon"
}
],
"depth": 3,
"era": "1943–2000",
"kind": "mixed",
"lessons": [
"Research that every farmer can use is a public good. Funding the institutions that keep producing it can change a whole food system, not one farm at a time.",
"Measuring success in one unit, tons of grain, hid costs that were counted in other units, such as water, soil, diets and who was left out.",
"Many of the harms grew from the rules around the technology, such as subsidies that encouraged overuse of inputs. The same tool does more or less damage depending on the policies it arrives with.",
"Costs that arrive decades later are easy to leave out of a success story. Long-horizon work needs long-horizon accounting."
],
"place": "Mexico, South and Southeast Asia, and other developing regions",
"sources": [
{
"note": null,
"publisher": "Prabhu L. Pingali, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109(31)",
"title": "Green Revolution: Impacts, limits, and the path ahead",
"url": "https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3411969/",
"year": 2012
},
{
"note": null,
"publisher": "Liesel Vink, Rockefeller Archive Center",
"title": "Photo Essay: Mexico and the Launch of the Green Revolution",
"url": "https://resource.rockarch.org/story/photo-essay-mexico-and-the-launch-of-the-green-revolution/",
"year": 2019
},
{
"note": null,
"publisher": "NobelPrize.org",
"title": "Norman Borlaug, Facts",
"url": "https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/peace/1970/borlaug/facts/",
"year": null
},
{
"note": "Reports a satellite study finding that northern India lost more than 109 cubic kilometers of groundwater between 2002 and 2008, mainly to irrigation pumping.",
"publisher": "University of California, Irvine, on Rodell, Velicogna and Famiglietti in Nature 460",
"title": "India groundwater",
"url": "https://news.uci.edu/2009/08/12/india-groundwater",
"year": 2009
}
],
"summary": "Foundation-funded crop research gave farmers high-yield wheat and rice, and cereal harvests in the developing world roughly tripled. The gains were uneven, and some of the costs, from falling water tables to narrower diets, showed up decades later.",
"title": "The Green Revolution"
},
"type": "entry"
},
"subjectHash": "1404e48632c4609f31213b0a4a6e41434b2c1960341512c42d50ffeb984b8a3b",
"version": 1
}