Research history

Current published edition

Rebuilding Haiti after the 2010 earthquake

As recorded by . This is a dated public record of drafts, changes, sources and review declarations. A page, checksum or merged pull request does not establish a scientific result or independent review.

Edition
edition:2026-10-27-initial
Edition checksum
63af9ab52aa86652f81ea1fac0b7c40aaad46cd8623865918d41ec347f9b2cd3
Projection checksum
08a373e3b85d7ed44d36bc472444b5773f7cbd1dde11f60e0053b3ba4884b65c
Period
inclusive to exclusive.
Starting baseline
Unknown before the recorded capture. Present states are not backdated to January.

JSON retains the complete pinned edition. CSV covers every recorded event in this edition; view filters do not change either download.

Recorded activity and qualification

  • 43Stable records
  • 45Subject versions
  • 43Recorded events
  • 0Review declarations
  • 0Subjects with qualifying source review
  • 0Peer-reviewed manuscripts
  • 0Qualifying research results
  • 1Editorial correction artifacts
  • 2Changed claim subjects
  • 23Open problems
  • 0Partially resolved problems
  • 0Solved problems
  • 0Problems under review
  • 0Unresolved challenges

Qualification follows the exact recorded public declarations. The ledger cannot establish identity, independence, source reading or truth by itself. Editorial corrections, proposed methods and software checks are separate from qualifying research results.

Coverage and limits

40 source entries are covered by this edition. Claim-level records cover only their selected wording and context; they do not qualify a whole manuscript. Source-derived case labels describe the published summaries, not Charitology fieldwork or charity ratings.

Entry links open the present site. The separate pinned source text retains this edition’s exact archived bytes.

Rebuilding Haiti after the 2010 earthquake · Source-derived case · version 1
Source review: draft

case:haiti-earthquake-reconstruction

Qualification follows the exact recorded public declarations. The ledger cannot establish identity, independence, source reading or truth by itself.

Versions and exact subjects

Version entries 1–1

Version 1: Rebuilding Haiti after the 2010 earthquake

Current subject in this edition

Subject checksum
cda759498993af70a94cdf464eec144dc5e45ba645e72094d1b7aabc1c75d14e
Version checksum
b7b26745141377f493fa9a973349e8ec5d20a4698755b56467ce39b2b78a834a
Authorship declaration
unknown; completeness unknown.
conditions
[
  {
    "collection": "conditions",
    "id": "story-bias"
  },
  {
    "collection": "conditions",
    "id": "restriction-reflex"
  },
  {
    "collection": "conditions",
    "id": "missing-voice"
  },
  {
    "collection": "conditions",
    "id": "measurement-gap"
  }
]
depth
1
era
2010–2015
kind
failure
lessons
[
  "Giving that follows the news arrives in a burst, mostly without research, and attention fades long before rebuilding is done.",
  "Money raised for one disaster is, in practice, tied to that place and to the group that raised it. When land titles, partners and government capacity take years to sort out, a large earmarked sum can outrun the ability to spend it well.",
  "Aid that goes around local institutions leaves them no stronger. Almost all relief aid went to international agencies and organizations rather than through Haitian ones.",
  "Counting people helped is not the same as measuring what changed. Without project-level spending and results, big claims can’t be checked by anyone."
]
place
Haiti
summary
Billions of dollars poured into Haiti after the 2010 earthquake, almost all of the relief aid through international organizations. In 2015 ProPublica and NPR reported that the American Red Cross had raised nearly half a billion dollars and built six permanent homes. The Red Cross said it had helped millions of Haitians in other ways.
Exact archived Markdown body

Inert source text, including its original formatting. It is not executed as page markup.

## What happened

The earthquake that struck Haiti in January 2010 drew a wave of giving. Americans gave an estimated $43 million by text message alone. In a Pew survey of those text donors, most had heard about the appeal on television, and half gave the moment they heard. By 2012, the Center for Global Development counted almost $6 billion in official aid disbursed and an estimated $3 billion more in private donations to charities.

The American Red Cross raised nearly half a billion dollars. In June 2015 ProPublica and NPR reported that it had built six permanent homes in all of Haiti. The Red Cross said it had provided homes to more than 130,000 people. The reporters found that count included people who got short-term rental aid, temporary shelters or construction training. A housing project in the Campeche neighborhood, for which an internal proposal estimated about 700 homes, built none. The Red Cross said it could not secure land rights. The reporters also described internal documents on staffing problems and, for one $5.4 million shelter project, layers of overhead that left about 60 percent for the work itself.

The Red Cross published a response the same day. It said donors’ money had built and run eight hospitals and clinics, helped stem a cholera outbreak, provided clean water and sanitation, and moved more than 100,000 people out of tents into safer housing. When land for new homes wasn’t available, it said, it paid for rental subsidies, repairs and retrofits. It said 90 percent of its Haiti staff were Haitian and criticized what it called the reporting’s “lack of balance, context and accuracy.”

## Where it sits in the system

Rebuilding homes is **repair** (level 1) on the [depth scale](/method/#depth). The lessons are about the channels the money took, and they reach far beyond one organization.

- **Attention.** The money followed the headlines ([Story Bias](/diagnosis/story-bias/)). In a 2012 Pew survey of text donors, 58 percent were following the rebuilding “not too closely” or not at all.
- **Restriction.** Money given for Haiti was, in effect, committed to Haiti and to the group that raised it, even where land disputes and government delays, the obstacles the Red Cross itself cited, made building slow ([the Restriction Reflex](/diagnosis/restriction-reflex/)).
- **Local voice.** About 99 percent of relief aid after the quake went to international agencies, the Red Cross movement and international charities and contractors, according to the UN Special Envoy’s office, which urged donors to work through Haitian institutions instead ([the Missing Voice](/diagnosis/missing-voice/)).
- **Measurement.** The Center for Global Development found few evaluations of what aid in Haiti had delivered, and called for spending and results to be published ([the Measurement Gap](/diagnosis/measurement-gap/)).

## What carries over

Before giving after a disaster, ask who is already working there, how much of the money will reach local organizations and how results will be reported. See the [Disaster Response Guide](/tools/disaster-response-guide/) and [Open Problem 8, the Optimal Restriction](/open-problems/the-optimal-restriction/).
Cited evidence
Pinned source capture
Exact version fields and declaration references
{
  "adapterVersion": "research-content-v1",
  "authorship": {
    "actorIds": [],
    "complete": false,
    "refs": [],
    "state": "unknown"
  },
  "hash": "b7b26745141377f493fa9a973349e8ec5d20a4698755b56467ce39b2b78a834a",
  "id": "version:case-haiti-earthquake-reconstruction-v1",
  "previousId": null,
  "recordId": "case:haiti-earthquake-reconstruction",
  "sources": [
    {
      "selector": {
        "kind": "entry"
      },
      "sourceId": "source:current-cases-haiti-earthquake-reconstruction"
    }
  ],
  "subject": {
    "body": "\n## What happened\n\nThe earthquake that struck Haiti in January 2010 drew a wave of giving. Americans gave an estimated $43 million by text message alone. In a Pew survey of those text donors, most had heard about the appeal on television, and half gave the moment they heard. By 2012, the Center for Global Development counted almost $6 billion in official aid disbursed and an estimated $3 billion more in private donations to charities.\n\nThe American Red Cross raised nearly half a billion dollars. In June 2015 ProPublica and NPR reported that it had built six permanent homes in all of Haiti. The Red Cross said it had provided homes to more than 130,000 people. The reporters found that count included people who got short-term rental aid, temporary shelters or construction training. A housing project in the Campeche neighborhood, for which an internal proposal estimated about 700 homes, built none. The Red Cross said it could not secure land rights. The reporters also described internal documents on staffing problems and, for one $5.4 million shelter project, layers of overhead that left about 60 percent for the work itself.\n\nThe Red Cross published a response the same day. It said donors’ money had built and run eight hospitals and clinics, helped stem a cholera outbreak, provided clean water and sanitation, and moved more than 100,000 people out of tents into safer housing. When land for new homes wasn’t available, it said, it paid for rental subsidies, repairs and retrofits. It said 90 percent of its Haiti staff were Haitian and criticized what it called the reporting’s “lack of balance, context and accuracy.”\n\n## Where it sits in the system\n\nRebuilding homes is **repair** (level 1) on the [depth scale](/method/#depth). The lessons are about the channels the money took, and they reach far beyond one organization.\n\n- **Attention.** The money followed the headlines ([Story Bias](/diagnosis/story-bias/)). In a 2012 Pew survey of text donors, 58 percent were following the rebuilding “not too closely” or not at all.\n- **Restriction.** Money given for Haiti was, in effect, committed to Haiti and to the group that raised it, even where land disputes and government delays, the obstacles the Red Cross itself cited, made building slow ([the Restriction Reflex](/diagnosis/restriction-reflex/)).\n- **Local voice.** About 99 percent of relief aid after the quake went to international agencies, the Red Cross movement and international charities and contractors, according to the UN Special Envoy’s office, which urged donors to work through Haitian institutions instead ([the Missing Voice](/diagnosis/missing-voice/)).\n- **Measurement.** The Center for Global Development found few evaluations of what aid in Haiti had delivered, and called for spending and results to be published ([the Measurement Gap](/diagnosis/measurement-gap/)).\n\n## What carries over\n\nBefore giving after a disaster, ask who is already working there, how much of the money will reach local organizations and how results will be reported. See the [Disaster Response Guide](/tools/disaster-response-guide/) and [Open Problem 8, the Optimal Restriction](/open-problems/the-optimal-restriction/).\n",
    "collection": "cases",
    "frontmatter": {
      "conditions": [
        {
          "collection": "conditions",
          "id": "story-bias"
        },
        {
          "collection": "conditions",
          "id": "restriction-reflex"
        },
        {
          "collection": "conditions",
          "id": "missing-voice"
        },
        {
          "collection": "conditions",
          "id": "measurement-gap"
        }
      ],
      "depth": 1,
      "era": "2010–2015",
      "kind": "failure",
      "lessons": [
        "Giving that follows the news arrives in a burst, mostly without research, and attention fades long before rebuilding is done.",
        "Money raised for one disaster is, in practice, tied to that place and to the group that raised it. When land titles, partners and government capacity take years to sort out, a large earmarked sum can outrun the ability to spend it well.",
        "Aid that goes around local institutions leaves them no stronger. Almost all relief aid went to international agencies and organizations rather than through Haitian ones.",
        "Counting people helped is not the same as measuring what changed. Without project-level spending and results, big claims can’t be checked by anyone."
      ],
      "place": "Haiti",
      "sources": [
        {
          "note": null,
          "publisher": "Justin Elliott (ProPublica) and Laura Sullivan (NPR)",
          "title": "How the Red Cross Raised Half a Billion Dollars for Haiti and Built Six Homes",
          "url": "https://www.propublica.org/article/how-the-red-cross-raised-half-a-billion-dollars-for-haiti-and-built-6-homes",
          "year": 2015
        },
        {
          "note": null,
          "publisher": "American Red Cross",
          "title": "American Red Cross Responds to Latest ProPublica and NPR Coverage",
          "url": "https://www.redcross.org/about-us/news-and-events/press-release/american-red-cross-responds-to-latest-propublica-and-npr-coverag.html",
          "year": 2015
        },
        {
          "note": null,
          "publisher": "UN News, on a report by the Office of the UN Special Envoy for Haiti",
          "title": "Give aid directly to Haitian institutions to build back better, says UN report",
          "url": "https://news.un.org/en/story/2011/06/379512",
          "year": 2011
        },
        {
          "note": null,
          "publisher": "Vijaya Ramachandran and Julie Walz, Center for Global Development",
          "title": "Haiti: Where Has All the Money Gone?",
          "url": "https://www.cgdev.org/publication/haiti-where-has-all-money-gone",
          "year": 2012
        },
        {
          "note": null,
          "publisher": "Aaron Smith, Pew Research Center",
          "title": "Real Time Charitable Giving",
          "url": "https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2012/01/12/real-time-charitable-giving/",
          "year": 2012
        }
      ],
      "summary": "Billions of dollars poured into Haiti after the 2010 earthquake, almost all of the relief aid through international organizations. In 2015 ProPublica and NPR reported that the American Red Cross had raised nearly half a billion dollars and built six permanent homes. The Red Cross said it had helped millions of Haitians in other ways.",
      "title": "Rebuilding Haiti after the 2010 earthquake"
    },
    "type": "entry"
  },
  "subjectHash": "cda759498993af70a94cdf464eec144dc5e45ba645e72094d1b7aabc1c75d14e",
  "version": 1
}

Timeline in recorded order

Public occurrence time and ledger recording time are different. A coverage baseline records what was present at capture; it does not invent an earlier history.

Events 1–1

Coverage baseline

Recorded order
4; sequence 1 for this record.
Public occurrence
Undated / no earlier occurrence asserted · undated
Recorded in ledger

Initial capture of current source wording; no earlier independent review or historical event time is asserted.

Observed baseline: version 1.

Exact event fields
{
  "actorIds": [],
  "hash": "cb3cc10c6a70405891cd99c2bb2dfc92f6da7479f5a7d852e30b934bd848fe33",
  "id": "event:case-haiti-earthquake-reconstruction-1",
  "initialProblemState": null,
  "observationIds": [],
  "occurredAt": null,
  "ordinal": 4,
  "previousHash": null,
  "previousId": null,
  "reason": "Initial capture of current source wording; no earlier independent review or historical event time is asserted.",
  "recordId": "case:haiti-earthquake-reconstruction",
  "recordedAt": "2026-10-27T08:31:31.000Z",
  "refs": [],
  "sequence": 1,
  "timeBasis": "undated",
  "type": "baseline",
  "version": {
    "recordId": "case:haiti-earthquake-reconstruction",
    "subjectHash": "cda759498993af70a94cdf464eec144dc5e45ba645e72094d1b7aabc1c75d14e",
    "version": 1
  }
}

Review declarations

No public review declaration is recorded for this subject in this edition.

Dated public metadata observations

These observations record only the displayed metadata at inspection. A merge, closed issue or empty review list does not establish research or independent review.

github-pull-request · 2026-10-27T08:20:16.587Z

Observed public object

{
  "base": "975bbbbbd198d4b3c4e1777013d0410588a838b3",
  "draft": false,
  "head": "3653d41717a86db2933b02664d7026a329350a66",
  "mergeCommit": "8df2d0ddbc6d91b9841c6bbb94dbde1fc7c00137",
  "mergedAt": "2026-10-27T08:10:57.000Z",
  "number": 15,
  "state": "closed"
}

be39e645f9291ea3931584665b011df77bfa8340e4d32f36562eb526f8e62396

github-pull-request · 2026-10-27T08:20:16.587Z

Observed public object

{
  "base": "905bdd27bb5f16027c3b3ad3c0f5ee3fc18e3e45",
  "draft": false,
  "head": "510320528e89f45caa9c42eb5a6eda3d6ad1bede",
  "mergeCommit": "3a57d24acc6efd4eb3ae60c59da36ea17c023fb9",
  "mergedAt": "2026-10-26T05:24:43.000Z",
  "number": 3,
  "state": "closed"
}

1ec26b57bd6ef466311b11958d47e9d144ec150ea5689838ae8036eb363aacbf

github-review-list · 2026-10-27T08:20:16.587Z

Observed public object

{
  "prNumber": 3,
  "reviewIds": []
}

3b7b719dbdd25b9937ba6c640f7234921611db30818b5675db41b9fa3534d926

github-issue · 2026-10-27T08:20:16.587Z

Observed public object

{
  "commentCount": 0,
  "number": 1,
  "state": "open"
}

b411d756f95b7434bc8a2a73dd5599f751afe621b2ab673c0e2e7b056d37bb14

Corrections stay public

This ledger reads checked-in public evidence. It does not read private browser registers, publish a local result, assign reviewers or rate charities. New evidence and corrections enter through the repository’s public contribution process.

How to contribute or challenge a claim