Research history

Current published edition

The hookworm campaign in the American South

As recorded by . This is a dated public record of drafts, changes, sources and review declarations. A page, checksum or merged pull request does not establish a scientific result or independent review.

Edition
edition:2026-10-27-initial
Edition checksum
63af9ab52aa86652f81ea1fac0b7c40aaad46cd8623865918d41ec347f9b2cd3
Projection checksum
08a373e3b85d7ed44d36bc472444b5773f7cbd1dde11f60e0053b3ba4884b65c
Period
inclusive to exclusive.
Starting baseline
Unknown before the recorded capture. Present states are not backdated to January.

JSON retains the complete pinned edition. CSV covers every recorded event in this edition; view filters do not change either download.

Recorded activity and qualification

  • 43Stable records
  • 45Subject versions
  • 43Recorded events
  • 0Review declarations
  • 0Subjects with qualifying source review
  • 0Peer-reviewed manuscripts
  • 0Qualifying research results
  • 1Editorial correction artifacts
  • 2Changed claim subjects
  • 23Open problems
  • 0Partially resolved problems
  • 0Solved problems
  • 0Problems under review
  • 0Unresolved challenges

Qualification follows the exact recorded public declarations. The ledger cannot establish identity, independence, source reading or truth by itself. Editorial corrections, proposed methods and software checks are separate from qualifying research results.

Coverage and limits

40 source entries are covered by this edition. Claim-level records cover only their selected wording and context; they do not qualify a whole manuscript. Source-derived case labels describe the published summaries, not Charitology fieldwork or charity ratings.

Entry links open the present site. The separate pinned source text retains this edition’s exact archived bytes.

The hookworm campaign in the American South · Source-derived case · version 1
Source review: draft

case:hookworm-campaign

Qualification follows the exact recorded public declarations. The ledger cannot establish identity, independence, source reading or truth by itself.

Versions and exact subjects

Version entries 1–1

Version 1: The hookworm campaign in the American South

Current subject in this edition

Subject checksum
6a45a22def2f400bd29ad3ea4dddd03466c55ef2b7405c3e82cecbbf5573cfaf
Version checksum
c47fb0a8fab787f284de5e03d5008ae834127d78806d3e145cf5473c809bc99a
Authorship declaration
unknown; completeness unknown.
conditions
[
  {
    "collection": "conditions",
    "id": "measurement-gap"
  },
  {
    "collection": "conditions",
    "id": "short-horizon"
  },
  {
    "collection": "conditions",
    "id": "symptom-trap"
  }
]
depth
3
era
1909–1914
kind
success
lessons
[
  "Measuring the problem first gave the campaign a baseline. County surveys before treatment, and resurveys after, showed whether the work was paying off.",
  "A time-limited funder can leave something permanent by working through public agencies. State and local governments took over some of the work as the commission wound down.",
  "Treating infected people repairs the damage, while privies and shoes stop new infections. Treatment alone lets a parasite come back.",
  "A name can overpromise. The commission was for “eradication,” and hookworm was reduced, not eliminated."
]
place
Southern United States
summary
A five-year, $1 million Rockefeller commission surveyed hundreds of Southern counties, treated more than 400,000 people for hookworm and pushed for sanitary privies. Hookworm was not eradicated, but school enrollment and literacy rose most where infection had been worst.
Exact archived Markdown body

Inert source text, including its original formatting. It is not executed as page markup.

## What happened

Hookworm larvae live in soil polluted by human waste and burrow in through the skin, often through bare feet. Infected children are often listless, anemic and stunted. In 1909 John D. Rockefeller gave $1 million to create the Rockefeller Sanitary Commission for the Eradication of Hookworm Disease, a five-year effort across eleven Southern states.

The commission started by measuring. It surveyed hundreds of counties and found that, on average, about 40 percent of school-age children were infected. Then it went to work: traveling dispensaries gave free treatment, lecturers and exhibits taught doctors, teachers and families to recognize the disease, and the campaign pushed for sanitary privies at schools and churches. It treated more than 400,000 people. In Arkansas, children were required to wear shoes to school, and meetings took on a carnival air, with testimonials, singing and refreshments.

The commission closed at the end of 1914. State governments had increased their own anti-hookworm spending as it wound down, and the newly founded Rockefeller Foundation carried the model abroad. Resurveys found infection had fallen by about 30 percentage points across the infected areas.

Hookworm was not eradicated. But the economist Hoyt Bleakley found that counties with more infection before the campaign saw bigger gains afterward in school enrollment, attendance and literacy. Following those children into adulthood, he found a substantial gain in income.

## Where it sits in the system

The campaign worked at several depths at once. Treatment was **repair** (level 1). Privies and shoes were **prevention** (level 2). Its lasting effect, the Rockefeller Archive Center notes, was to set a model for public health by building services into state and local government. That is **structure** (level 3) on the [depth scale](/method/#depth), and it is why a commission with a five-year life could have effects that lasted.

It is also an early answer to the [Measurement Gap](/diagnosis/measurement-gap/). Because the commission surveyed before it treated, it knew where the problem was worst and could check its own progress. Nobody had to guess. And it avoided the [Symptom Trap](/diagnosis/symptom-trap/) by pairing treatment with the sanitation that stops reinfection.

## What carries over

Measure the problem before you treat it, and plan for who will carry on the work when you stop. A short-lived funder can leave behind a permanent public capacity if it builds through the institutions that will remain. Be careful with words like “eradication” unless eradication is really on the table.
Cited evidence
Pinned source capture
Exact version fields and declaration references
{
  "adapterVersion": "research-content-v1",
  "authorship": {
    "actorIds": [],
    "complete": false,
    "refs": [],
    "state": "unknown"
  },
  "hash": "c47fb0a8fab787f284de5e03d5008ae834127d78806d3e145cf5473c809bc99a",
  "id": "version:case-hookworm-campaign-v1",
  "previousId": null,
  "recordId": "case:hookworm-campaign",
  "sources": [
    {
      "selector": {
        "kind": "entry"
      },
      "sourceId": "source:current-cases-hookworm-campaign"
    }
  ],
  "subject": {
    "body": "\n## What happened\n\nHookworm larvae live in soil polluted by human waste and burrow in through the skin, often through bare feet. Infected children are often listless, anemic and stunted. In 1909 John D. Rockefeller gave $1 million to create the Rockefeller Sanitary Commission for the Eradication of Hookworm Disease, a five-year effort across eleven Southern states.\n\nThe commission started by measuring. It surveyed hundreds of counties and found that, on average, about 40 percent of school-age children were infected. Then it went to work: traveling dispensaries gave free treatment, lecturers and exhibits taught doctors, teachers and families to recognize the disease, and the campaign pushed for sanitary privies at schools and churches. It treated more than 400,000 people. In Arkansas, children were required to wear shoes to school, and meetings took on a carnival air, with testimonials, singing and refreshments.\n\nThe commission closed at the end of 1914. State governments had increased their own anti-hookworm spending as it wound down, and the newly founded Rockefeller Foundation carried the model abroad. Resurveys found infection had fallen by about 30 percentage points across the infected areas.\n\nHookworm was not eradicated. But the economist Hoyt Bleakley found that counties with more infection before the campaign saw bigger gains afterward in school enrollment, attendance and literacy. Following those children into adulthood, he found a substantial gain in income.\n\n## Where it sits in the system\n\nThe campaign worked at several depths at once. Treatment was **repair** (level 1). Privies and shoes were **prevention** (level 2). Its lasting effect, the Rockefeller Archive Center notes, was to set a model for public health by building services into state and local government. That is **structure** (level 3) on the [depth scale](/method/#depth), and it is why a commission with a five-year life could have effects that lasted.\n\nIt is also an early answer to the [Measurement Gap](/diagnosis/measurement-gap/). Because the commission surveyed before it treated, it knew where the problem was worst and could check its own progress. Nobody had to guess. And it avoided the [Symptom Trap](/diagnosis/symptom-trap/) by pairing treatment with the sanitation that stops reinfection.\n\n## What carries over\n\nMeasure the problem before you treat it, and plan for who will carry on the work when you stop. A short-lived funder can leave behind a permanent public capacity if it builds through the institutions that will remain. Be careful with words like “eradication” unless eradication is really on the table.\n",
    "collection": "cases",
    "frontmatter": {
      "conditions": [
        {
          "collection": "conditions",
          "id": "measurement-gap"
        },
        {
          "collection": "conditions",
          "id": "short-horizon"
        },
        {
          "collection": "conditions",
          "id": "symptom-trap"
        }
      ],
      "depth": 3,
      "era": "1909–1914",
      "kind": "success",
      "lessons": [
        "Measuring the problem first gave the campaign a baseline. County surveys before treatment, and resurveys after, showed whether the work was paying off.",
        "A time-limited funder can leave something permanent by working through public agencies. State and local governments took over some of the work as the commission wound down.",
        "Treating infected people repairs the damage, while privies and shoes stop new infections. Treatment alone lets a parasite come back.",
        "A name can overpromise. The commission was for “eradication,” and hookworm was reduced, not eliminated."
      ],
      "place": "Southern United States",
      "sources": [
        {
          "note": null,
          "publisher": "Hoyt Bleakley, Quarterly Journal of Economics 122(1)",
          "title": "Disease and Development: Evidence from Hookworm Eradication in the American South",
          "url": "https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3800113/",
          "year": 2007
        },
        {
          "note": null,
          "publisher": "Liesel Vink, Rockefeller Archive Center",
          "title": "Photo Essay: The Rockefeller Sanitary Commission and the American South",
          "url": "https://resource.rockarch.org/story/the-rockefeller-sanitary-commission-and-the-south/",
          "year": 2019
        },
        {
          "note": null,
          "publisher": "Rebecca Haden, Encyclopedia of Arkansas",
          "title": "Hookworm Eradication",
          "url": "https://encyclopediaofarkansas.net/entries/hookworm-eradication-2233/",
          "year": null
        }
      ],
      "summary": "A five-year, $1 million Rockefeller commission surveyed hundreds of Southern counties, treated more than 400,000 people for hookworm and pushed for sanitary privies. Hookworm was not eradicated, but school enrollment and literacy rose most where infection had been worst.",
      "title": "The hookworm campaign in the American South"
    },
    "type": "entry"
  },
  "subjectHash": "6a45a22def2f400bd29ad3ea4dddd03466c55ef2b7405c3e82cecbbf5573cfaf",
  "version": 1
}

Timeline in recorded order

Public occurrence time and ledger recording time are different. A coverage baseline records what was present at capture; it does not invent an earlier history.

Events 1–1

Coverage baseline

Recorded order
5; sequence 1 for this record.
Public occurrence
Undated / no earlier occurrence asserted · undated
Recorded in ledger

Initial capture of current source wording; no earlier independent review or historical event time is asserted.

Observed baseline: version 1.

Exact event fields
{
  "actorIds": [],
  "hash": "4f324a4802a54d18240b5a43a6511e39004eae3986c2fb7abfc42134537e4e85",
  "id": "event:case-hookworm-campaign-1",
  "initialProblemState": null,
  "observationIds": [],
  "occurredAt": null,
  "ordinal": 5,
  "previousHash": null,
  "previousId": null,
  "reason": "Initial capture of current source wording; no earlier independent review or historical event time is asserted.",
  "recordId": "case:hookworm-campaign",
  "recordedAt": "2026-10-27T08:31:31.000Z",
  "refs": [],
  "sequence": 1,
  "timeBasis": "undated",
  "type": "baseline",
  "version": {
    "recordId": "case:hookworm-campaign",
    "subjectHash": "6a45a22def2f400bd29ad3ea4dddd03466c55ef2b7405c3e82cecbbf5573cfaf",
    "version": 1
  }
}

Review declarations

No public review declaration is recorded for this subject in this edition.

Dated public metadata observations

These observations record only the displayed metadata at inspection. A merge, closed issue or empty review list does not establish research or independent review.

github-pull-request · 2026-10-27T08:20:16.587Z

Observed public object

{
  "base": "975bbbbbd198d4b3c4e1777013d0410588a838b3",
  "draft": false,
  "head": "3653d41717a86db2933b02664d7026a329350a66",
  "mergeCommit": "8df2d0ddbc6d91b9841c6bbb94dbde1fc7c00137",
  "mergedAt": "2026-10-27T08:10:57.000Z",
  "number": 15,
  "state": "closed"
}

be39e645f9291ea3931584665b011df77bfa8340e4d32f36562eb526f8e62396

github-pull-request · 2026-10-27T08:20:16.587Z

Observed public object

{
  "base": "905bdd27bb5f16027c3b3ad3c0f5ee3fc18e3e45",
  "draft": false,
  "head": "510320528e89f45caa9c42eb5a6eda3d6ad1bede",
  "mergeCommit": "3a57d24acc6efd4eb3ae60c59da36ea17c023fb9",
  "mergedAt": "2026-10-26T05:24:43.000Z",
  "number": 3,
  "state": "closed"
}

1ec26b57bd6ef466311b11958d47e9d144ec150ea5689838ae8036eb363aacbf

github-review-list · 2026-10-27T08:20:16.587Z

Observed public object

{
  "prNumber": 3,
  "reviewIds": []
}

3b7b719dbdd25b9937ba6c640f7234921611db30818b5675db41b9fa3534d926

github-issue · 2026-10-27T08:20:16.587Z

Observed public object

{
  "commentCount": 0,
  "number": 1,
  "state": "open"
}

b411d756f95b7434bc8a2a73dd5599f751afe621b2ab673c0e2e7b056d37bb14

Corrections stay public

This ledger reads checked-in public evidence. It does not read private browser registers, publish a local result, assign reviewers or rate charities. New evidence and corrections enter through the repository’s public contribution process.

How to contribute or challenge a claim