Research history

Current published edition

How oral rehydration therapy spread

As recorded by . This is a dated public record of drafts, changes, sources and review declarations. A page, checksum or merged pull request does not establish a scientific result or independent review.

Edition
edition:2026-10-27-initial
Edition checksum
63af9ab52aa86652f81ea1fac0b7c40aaad46cd8623865918d41ec347f9b2cd3
Projection checksum
08a373e3b85d7ed44d36bc472444b5773f7cbd1dde11f60e0053b3ba4884b65c
Period
inclusive to exclusive.
Starting baseline
Unknown before the recorded capture. Present states are not backdated to January.

JSON retains the complete pinned edition. CSV covers every recorded event in this edition; view filters do not change either download.

Recorded activity and qualification

  • 43Stable records
  • 45Subject versions
  • 43Recorded events
  • 0Review declarations
  • 0Subjects with qualifying source review
  • 0Peer-reviewed manuscripts
  • 0Qualifying research results
  • 1Editorial correction artifacts
  • 2Changed claim subjects
  • 23Open problems
  • 0Partially resolved problems
  • 0Solved problems
  • 0Problems under review
  • 0Unresolved challenges

Qualification follows the exact recorded public declarations. The ledger cannot establish identity, independence, source reading or truth by itself. Editorial corrections, proposed methods and software checks are separate from qualifying research results.

Coverage and limits

40 source entries are covered by this edition. Claim-level records cover only their selected wording and context; they do not qualify a whole manuscript. Source-derived case labels describe the published summaries, not Charitology fieldwork or charity ratings.

Entry links open the present site. The separate pinned source text retains this edition’s exact archived bytes.

How oral rehydration therapy spread · Source-derived case · version 1
Source review: draft

case:oral-rehydration-therapy-spread

Qualification follows the exact recorded public declarations. The ledger cannot establish identity, independence, source reading or truth by itself.

Versions and exact subjects

Version entries 1–1

Version 1: How oral rehydration therapy spread

Current subject in this edition

Subject checksum
1cbc32aa6561c34f73efd94e4c9828c89bb0c9edba46b2b893ff3711be268a27
Version checksum
cd55f1fb3e94ba4475ae3110090ebb06467f926fcff62d8d9aa531eb1e169066
Authorship declaration
unknown; completeness unknown.
conditions
[
  {
    "collection": "conditions",
    "id": "missing-voice"
  },
  {
    "collection": "conditions",
    "id": "measurement-gap"
  }
]
depth
0
era
1971–2000
kind
success
lessons
[
  "The cheapest fix can be one of the biggest. Oral rehydration salts cost a few cents per treatment.",
  "Putting treatment in families’ hands, not only in clinics, is what let it reach millions. That meant convincing doctors that people with little training could give it.",
  "Checking whether people can really do what they were taught is part of the intervention. Years after BRAC’s campaign, researchers tested the solutions mothers made at home.",
  "Relief at scale is not a lesser good. A treatment that meets the need today, everywhere, can save more lives than far more ambitious programs."
]
place
Bangladesh, India and worldwide
summary
A drink of clean water, sugar and salt can save a child from dying of diarrhea. After it was used to treat refugees during a 1971 cholera outbreak, it spread through health programs and door-to-door teaching, while child deaths from diarrhea fell from an estimated 4.6 million a year in 1980 to about 1.5 million by 2000.
Exact archived Markdown body

Inert source text, including its original formatting. It is not executed as page markup.

## What happened

For most of history, diarrhea killed mainly through dehydration, draining the body of water and salts. Oral rehydration salts, a mix of clean water, sugar and salt, are absorbed in the small intestine and replace what is lost. A treatment costs a few cents.

The formula came out of years of studies in Kolkata and Dhaka. In 1971, during a cholera outbreak among refugees from what is now Bangladesh, Dilip Mahalanabis of the Johns Hopkins center in Kolkata treated patients at Bangaon, India, with the solution, dispensed from drums. He and Dhiman Barua of the World Health Organization had to persuade a skeptical medical profession that people with little training could give it. In 1978 Barua set up WHO’s program to control diarrheal diseases. After oral rehydration therapy was introduced in 1979, it quickly became the cornerstone of diarrhea control programs. The Lancet called it “potentially the most important medical advance” of the century.

In Bangladesh, the nonprofit BRAC took it door to door. Between 1980 and 1990 it taught more than 12 million mothers to make the solution at home with common salt and unrefined brown sugar. In 1993 researchers revisited more than 9,000 households and tested solutions made by a sample of mothers. More than 70 percent of mothers could make one that was chemically safe and effective, and many of them had been very young during the campaign. The solution was used in 60 percent of recent bouts of diarrhea.

Worldwide, deaths of children under five from diarrhea fell from an estimated 4.6 million in 1980 to about 1.5 million by 2000. Oral rehydration played a significant part, though not the only one.

## Where it sits in the system

On the [depth scale](/method/#depth) this is **relief** (level 0). It treats the illness in front of you and does not stop diarrhea from happening. That is the point of the case: depth describes, it doesn’t grade, and relief delivered everywhere saved millions of lives.

The spread is a counterexample to the [Missing Voice](/diagnosis/missing-voice/). The breakthrough was trusting families, not only doctors, to deliver care. And it shows the [Measurement Gap](/diagnosis/measurement-gap/) from both sides. Researchers in Bangladesh tested what mothers could actually do, while a 2000 review of the global record found that patchy data and differing definitions of the therapy made trends hard to track.

## What carries over

Simple, cheap, taught at home and checked: that combination carried a relief treatment to millions of families. Relief does not end the need, though. Diarrhea still kills around 443,832 children under five a year, according to WHO, and preventing it takes safe water, sanitation, handwashing and rotavirus vaccines. See the [Intervention Database entry](/record/interventions/oral-rehydration-therapy/).
Cited evidence
Pinned source capture
Exact version fields and declaration references
{
  "adapterVersion": "research-content-v1",
  "authorship": {
    "actorIds": [],
    "complete": false,
    "refs": [],
    "state": "unknown"
  },
  "hash": "cd55f1fb3e94ba4475ae3110090ebb06467f926fcff62d8d9aa531eb1e169066",
  "id": "version:case-oral-rehydration-therapy-spread-v1",
  "previousId": null,
  "recordId": "case:oral-rehydration-therapy-spread",
  "sources": [
    {
      "selector": {
        "kind": "entry"
      },
      "sourceId": "source:current-cases-oral-rehydration-therapy-spread"
    }
  ],
  "subject": {
    "body": "\n## What happened\n\nFor most of history, diarrhea killed mainly through dehydration, draining the body of water and salts. Oral rehydration salts, a mix of clean water, sugar and salt, are absorbed in the small intestine and replace what is lost. A treatment costs a few cents.\n\nThe formula came out of years of studies in Kolkata and Dhaka. In 1971, during a cholera outbreak among refugees from what is now Bangladesh, Dilip Mahalanabis of the Johns Hopkins center in Kolkata treated patients at Bangaon, India, with the solution, dispensed from drums. He and Dhiman Barua of the World Health Organization had to persuade a skeptical medical profession that people with little training could give it. In 1978 Barua set up WHO’s program to control diarrheal diseases. After oral rehydration therapy was introduced in 1979, it quickly became the cornerstone of diarrhea control programs. The Lancet called it “potentially the most important medical advance” of the century.\n\nIn Bangladesh, the nonprofit BRAC took it door to door. Between 1980 and 1990 it taught more than 12 million mothers to make the solution at home with common salt and unrefined brown sugar. In 1993 researchers revisited more than 9,000 households and tested solutions made by a sample of mothers. More than 70 percent of mothers could make one that was chemically safe and effective, and many of them had been very young during the campaign. The solution was used in 60 percent of recent bouts of diarrhea.\n\nWorldwide, deaths of children under five from diarrhea fell from an estimated 4.6 million in 1980 to about 1.5 million by 2000. Oral rehydration played a significant part, though not the only one.\n\n## Where it sits in the system\n\nOn the [depth scale](/method/#depth) this is **relief** (level 0). It treats the illness in front of you and does not stop diarrhea from happening. That is the point of the case: depth describes, it doesn’t grade, and relief delivered everywhere saved millions of lives.\n\nThe spread is a counterexample to the [Missing Voice](/diagnosis/missing-voice/). The breakthrough was trusting families, not only doctors, to deliver care. And it shows the [Measurement Gap](/diagnosis/measurement-gap/) from both sides. Researchers in Bangladesh tested what mothers could actually do, while a 2000 review of the global record found that patchy data and differing definitions of the therapy made trends hard to track.\n\n## What carries over\n\nSimple, cheap, taught at home and checked: that combination carried a relief treatment to millions of families. Relief does not end the need, though. Diarrhea still kills around 443,832 children under five a year, according to WHO, and preventing it takes safe water, sanitation, handwashing and rotavirus vaccines. See the [Intervention Database entry](/record/interventions/oral-rehydration-therapy/).\n",
    "collection": "cases",
    "frontmatter": {
      "conditions": [
        {
          "collection": "conditions",
          "id": "missing-voice"
        },
        {
          "collection": "conditions",
          "id": "measurement-gap"
        }
      ],
      "depth": 0,
      "era": "1971–2000",
      "kind": "success",
      "lessons": [
        "The cheapest fix can be one of the biggest. Oral rehydration salts cost a few cents per treatment.",
        "Putting treatment in families’ hands, not only in clinics, is what let it reach millions. That meant convincing doctors that people with little training could give it.",
        "Checking whether people can really do what they were taught is part of the intervention. Years after BRAC’s campaign, researchers tested the solutions mothers made at home.",
        "Relief at scale is not a lesser good. A treatment that meets the need today, everywhere, can save more lives than far more ambitious programs."
      ],
      "place": "Bangladesh, India and worldwide",
      "sources": [
        {
          "note": null,
          "publisher": "Cesar G. Victora, Jennifer Bryce, Olivier Fontaine and Roeland Monasch, Bulletin of the World Health Organization 78(10)",
          "title": "Reducing deaths from diarrhoea through oral rehydration therapy",
          "url": "https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2560623/",
          "year": 2000
        },
        {
          "note": null,
          "publisher": "Bulletin of the World Health Organization 87(2)",
          "title": "Miracle cure for an old scourge",
          "url": "https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2636196/",
          "year": 2009
        },
        {
          "note": null,
          "publisher": "A. Mushtaque R. Chowdhury, Fazlul Karim, Sanjit K. Sarkar, Richard A. Cash and Abbas Bhuiya, Health Policy and Planning 12(1)",
          "title": "The status of ORT (oral rehydration therapy) in Bangladesh: how widely is it used?",
          "url": "https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/12.1.58",
          "year": 1997
        },
        {
          "note": null,
          "publisher": "World Health Organization",
          "title": "Diarrhoeal disease, fact sheet",
          "url": "https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/diarrhoeal-disease",
          "year": 2024
        }
      ],
      "summary": "A drink of clean water, sugar and salt can save a child from dying of diarrhea. After it was used to treat refugees during a 1971 cholera outbreak, it spread through health programs and door-to-door teaching, while child deaths from diarrhea fell from an estimated 4.6 million a year in 1980 to about 1.5 million by 2000.",
      "title": "How oral rehydration therapy spread"
    },
    "type": "entry"
  },
  "subjectHash": "1cbc32aa6561c34f73efd94e4c9828c89bb0c9edba46b2b893ff3711be268a27",
  "version": 1
}

Timeline in recorded order

Public occurrence time and ledger recording time are different. A coverage baseline records what was present at capture; it does not invent an earlier history.

Events 1–1

Coverage baseline

Recorded order
8; sequence 1 for this record.
Public occurrence
Undated / no earlier occurrence asserted · undated
Recorded in ledger

Initial capture of current source wording; no earlier independent review or historical event time is asserted.

Observed baseline: version 1.

Exact event fields
{
  "actorIds": [],
  "hash": "12889f73f3aac3f3cc55c6ffd58d6d935ce85084df2cbf6a5d8eb5639fc93aa0",
  "id": "event:case-oral-rehydration-therapy-spread-1",
  "initialProblemState": null,
  "observationIds": [],
  "occurredAt": null,
  "ordinal": 8,
  "previousHash": null,
  "previousId": null,
  "reason": "Initial capture of current source wording; no earlier independent review or historical event time is asserted.",
  "recordId": "case:oral-rehydration-therapy-spread",
  "recordedAt": "2026-10-27T08:31:31.000Z",
  "refs": [],
  "sequence": 1,
  "timeBasis": "undated",
  "type": "baseline",
  "version": {
    "recordId": "case:oral-rehydration-therapy-spread",
    "subjectHash": "1cbc32aa6561c34f73efd94e4c9828c89bb0c9edba46b2b893ff3711be268a27",
    "version": 1
  }
}

Review declarations

No public review declaration is recorded for this subject in this edition.

Dated public metadata observations

These observations record only the displayed metadata at inspection. A merge, closed issue or empty review list does not establish research or independent review.

github-pull-request · 2026-10-27T08:20:16.587Z

Observed public object

{
  "base": "975bbbbbd198d4b3c4e1777013d0410588a838b3",
  "draft": false,
  "head": "3653d41717a86db2933b02664d7026a329350a66",
  "mergeCommit": "8df2d0ddbc6d91b9841c6bbb94dbde1fc7c00137",
  "mergedAt": "2026-10-27T08:10:57.000Z",
  "number": 15,
  "state": "closed"
}

be39e645f9291ea3931584665b011df77bfa8340e4d32f36562eb526f8e62396

github-pull-request · 2026-10-27T08:20:16.587Z

Observed public object

{
  "base": "905bdd27bb5f16027c3b3ad3c0f5ee3fc18e3e45",
  "draft": false,
  "head": "510320528e89f45caa9c42eb5a6eda3d6ad1bede",
  "mergeCommit": "3a57d24acc6efd4eb3ae60c59da36ea17c023fb9",
  "mergedAt": "2026-10-26T05:24:43.000Z",
  "number": 3,
  "state": "closed"
}

1ec26b57bd6ef466311b11958d47e9d144ec150ea5689838ae8036eb363aacbf

github-review-list · 2026-10-27T08:20:16.587Z

Observed public object

{
  "prNumber": 3,
  "reviewIds": []
}

3b7b719dbdd25b9937ba6c640f7234921611db30818b5675db41b9fa3534d926

github-issue · 2026-10-27T08:20:16.587Z

Observed public object

{
  "commentCount": 0,
  "number": 1,
  "state": "open"
}

b411d756f95b7434bc8a2a73dd5599f751afe621b2ab673c0e2e7b056d37bb14

Corrections stay public

This ledger reads checked-in public evidence. It does not read private browser registers, publish a local result, assign reviewers or rate charities. New evidence and corrections enter through the repository’s public contribution process.

How to contribute or challenge a claim