Version 1: The Replication Rate
- Subject checksum
22e313fa3bf8aeb4c22448662a5fd4f76c09a4545fa0b6d0354e1234b2c0d669- Version checksum
2bfd6c82b2e6d78ae4a82ab51968dc62eb01c45f6e93d3910a2d8289ce05e0cc- Authorship declaration
- unknown; completeness unknown.
- bounty
- Unfunded. The Question Bounties program will attach prizes once it is funded.
- conditions
[ { "collection": "conditions", "id": "silence-about-failure" }, { "collection": "conditions", "id": "measurement-gap" } ]- number
- 10
- progress
- A systematic replication project covering a defined set of influential findings, publishing the rate with confidence bounds.
- statement
- What share of headline charity impact findings replicate when they are tested again?
Exact archived Markdown body
Inert source text, including its original formatting. It is not executed as page markup.
## Why it matters The [Replication Program](/programs/replication-program/) describes published checks in psychology and deworming research. Charitology has not established an equivalent sector-wide rate for charity impact findings. Donors deserve to know how much to trust a headline. ## Where to start Choose a fixed list of widely cited findings, pre-register the replication plan and publish everything, including findings that replicate. See the [Replication Program](/programs/replication-program/).
Pinned source capture
- src/content/problems/the-replication-rate.md · whole entry
e46fec9bd6fff1100c98b794e314750ed30b1d1c1d67de0c5d620b99e754a663· 952 UTF-8 bytes · commit8df2d0ddbc6d91b9841c6bbb94dbde1fc7c00137
Exact version fields and declaration references
{
"adapterVersion": "research-content-v1",
"authorship": {
"actorIds": [],
"complete": false,
"refs": [],
"state": "unknown"
},
"hash": "2bfd6c82b2e6d78ae4a82ab51968dc62eb01c45f6e93d3910a2d8289ce05e0cc",
"id": "version:problem-the-replication-rate-v1",
"previousId": null,
"recordId": "problem:the-replication-rate",
"sources": [
{
"selector": {
"kind": "entry"
},
"sourceId": "source:current-problems-the-replication-rate"
}
],
"subject": {
"body": "\n## Why it matters\n\nThe [Replication Program](/programs/replication-program/) describes published checks in psychology and deworming research. Charitology has not established an equivalent sector-wide rate for charity impact findings. Donors deserve to know how much to trust a headline.\n\n## Where to start\n\nChoose a fixed list of widely cited findings, pre-register the replication plan and publish everything, including findings that replicate. See the [Replication Program](/programs/replication-program/).\n",
"collection": "problems",
"frontmatter": {
"bounty": "Unfunded. The Question Bounties program will attach prizes once it is funded.",
"conditions": [
{
"collection": "conditions",
"id": "silence-about-failure"
},
{
"collection": "conditions",
"id": "measurement-gap"
}
],
"number": 10,
"progress": "A systematic replication project covering a defined set of influential findings, publishing the rate with confidence bounds.",
"sources": [],
"statement": "What share of headline charity impact findings replicate when they are tested again?",
"title": "The Replication Rate"
},
"type": "entry"
},
"subjectHash": "22e313fa3bf8aeb4c22448662a5fd4f76c09a4545fa0b6d0354e1234b2c0d669",
"version": 1
}